When did it suddenly become cool to hate everything? It's a growing problem, especially in the entertainment world, and no one benefits from an increasingly hard to please, pessimistic audience.
Details
October 19, 2007
76.4 KB 76.4 KB 396×612 StatisticsShare
Link
Embed
Thumb
|
Comments
This image was one of the few of your images that I couldn't connect to at first. I didn't get it at all, but often I don't feel I need to "get it" to connect with your images.
At first, I thought Ms. D was standing behind some kind of small table, with the legs being the table and the coat tails being stylized legs. In that imagined pose, She looked more like a bored Blackjack dealer than the Goddess of Desires. (She still looks a little bit bored to me, I'm afraid.)
There are some intriguing variances. I suppose that the briefcase replaces the chains, but why are the couple clothed? (AFAIK their nakedness is symbolic of the affinity between innocence and depravity.) Why isn't She winged, and where is the reference to Cups? Why is She looking sideways instead of straight into my desirous heart? Why am I so anal about the symbolology of this card?
Good work, anyway. I think it will grow on me in time.
Edit: Um, the levitation replaces the wings, doesn't it?
She is bored with being blamed for all the evil in the world; she has better things to do than to put her fingers in every little mortal pie. A tiny little part of her will come whisper secrets in your ear if you invite it. But she doesn't really care.
At some point the coat-tails will probably be tweaked and the legs will get a bit more contrast added. I was tired when I finished this one. *grin*
--
egypt.urnash.com. minimal stuff.
And doing a wonderful job of it: your cards are original and refreshing, a Tarot with roots but not very much baggage. For me, this suite has rekindled my (never very serious) interest in the Tarot. It's enlightening to hear your thoughts about the specific choices you've made, that's all.
BTW, this isn't really my soapbox, but my view of the Lady in question (I try to avoid calling her the Devil because of the misleading Christian connotations) is that She revels in Her work, because She is the great eye-opener. She confronts everyone with the challenge "You want more than this. It can be better. Baby, we *can* get higher.", and in doing so She helps people grow and realize their potential. She's not the enemy of any man or deity, She's the enemy of sterile innocence.
I suppose that's why I wanted her to be a bit more enthusiastic. I'll shut up now
My take on Tarot, so far, is generally a kind of 'chaos magic' one. Several of them have Kali grinning at the viewer from beneath a veneer of lip service to the medieval Christian symbolism at the core of the deck. I'm not sure who's wearing the mask of 'the Devil' here but she clearly has no interest in the 'good OR evil' place she's been stuck in by the role; she'd rather be out doing something. My theme for this card, I think, is the lies commonly associated with the Devil - and my opinion that the whole system that gives us a choice between a Jehova or a Lucifer is a lie.
A lot of the other cards I'm doing are about celebrating and embracing change/chaos/challenge, and looking to the future; this is one about being trapped in old mindsets.
--
egypt.urnash.com. minimal stuff.
--
"Creativity is the sudden cessation of stupidity." -Edwin Land
Previous PageNext Page